TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Tesla's net margin of 3.78%. Tesla's return on equity of 10.47% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $331.92, signalling upside risk potential of 22.31%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.81%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Tesla has a beta of 2.504, which suggesting that the stock is 150.394% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.114%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Tesla's net income of $2.4B is higher than Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 133.36x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 7.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 9.74x versus 0.22x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Tesla's net margin of -6.21%. Tesla's return on equity of 10.47% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $331.92, signalling upside risk potential of 22.31%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $61.81 which suggests that it could grow by 21.31%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than General Motors.

Tesla has a beta of 2.504, which suggesting that the stock is 150.394% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.563%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Tesla's net income of $2.4B is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 133.36x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 9.74x versus 0.31x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Tesla's net margin of -169.41%. Tesla's return on equity of 10.47% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $331.92, signalling upside risk potential of 22.31%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.43 which suggests that it could grow by 2.97%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Tesla has a beta of 2.504, which suggesting that the stock is 150.394% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. Tesla's net income of $2.4B is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 133.36x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 9.74x versus 7.13x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Tesla's net margin of -42.85%. Tesla's return on equity of 10.47% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $331.92, signalling upside risk potential of 22.31%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 21.22%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Tesla has a beta of 2.504, which suggesting that the stock is 150.394% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Tesla's net income of $2.4B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 133.36x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 9.74x versus 2.47x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.